What Oracle Cannot Handle

From DedicatedStructuresVersusRdbms: "It would be interesting to study that patterns of systems and requirements where Oracle (considered the performance leader) is [allegedly] not good enough."

That was Top, right? Sigh...this digression should not be necessary.

A quick search finds e.g.:

"SAG is claiming Tamino is 10-40 times faster than Oracle 8i." http://listserv.uark.edu/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind0002d&L=sag-l&F=&S=&P=6696

''"[Lawson non-relational database] is much faster than Oracle or the other relational databases"'' http://www.mail-archive.com/oracle-l@fatcity.com/msg71361.html

These things are not interesting. A general purpose relational database can always be beaten, speed-wise, by some special purpose piece of software.

Pay closer attention this time: this has been proven mathematically; it is not a subjective opinion. See the NoFreeLunchTheorem, like I said before.

And actually, it was obvious even before that, that this is usually true. The theorem is interesting because it proved that it is always true.

EditText of this page (last edited June 6, 2004) or FindPage with title or text search